Can I meditate for an hour?

Let us journey together to meditate for an hour and whether that is possible?

The intention (cetanā) to meditate for a sustained period is a powerful, wholesome mental formation (saṅkhāra). However, we often treat it as a solid block of willpower, a command issued by a central “I.” When we fail, we feel “I am weak.” When we succeed, we feel “I am a good meditator.”

The insightful practice is to turn our awareness onto the intention itself and see it as just another conditioned, impermanent phenomenon. Let’s trace its entire life cycle through the lens of our three characteristics.

Phase 1: The Arising of the Intention (Before the Sit)
The Conventional View: “I have decided to meditate for an hour.” The decision feels firm and resolute, originating from a solid self.

The Insightful Investigation:
Vipariṇāmi (The Process):
The intention doesn’t just appear. It is a process of formation. Perhaps you remembered the peace from a previous session. A thought arose (“I should meditate”), which was followed by a pleasant feeling. This fueled the volition to clear your schedule and find a cushion. You are observing the process of a wholesome intention being constructed out of various other mental states.

Aññathābhāvī (The Result):
Your mental state has changed. “The state of being engaged in worldly activity has ceased. Now, the state of being resolved and directed towards seclusion has arisen.” A significant state-change has occurred, initiated by this new intention.

Anicca (The Principle): This initial, powerful resolve feels solid, but it is radically uncertain. It is conditioned by memory, your current energy level, and your environment. It is a beautiful, wholesome, but ultimately fragile and impermanent mental state. It is not a guarantee of success.

Phase 2: The First Ten Minutes (The Initial Fervor)
The Conventional View:
“Great, I’m doing it. I’m meditating.” The intention feels strong and is actively guiding the mind to the breath.

The Insightful Investigation:
Vipariṇāmi: The intention is now actively working. It is a process of repeatedly directing the mind, letting go of initial thoughts, and settling the body. You can feel this “will” as an active, forward-moving energy.

Aññathābhāvī: “The state of mental chatter has ceased (momentarily), and a state of focused attention, born from the initial intention, has arisen.”

Anicca: This initial state of calm focus is wonderfully pleasant but completely unreliable. It is entirely dependent on the momentum of that first intention and the absence of strong competing ones. It will not last.

Phase 3: The Middle Forty Minutes (The Battleground of Intentions)
The Conventional View:
“This is so hard. My leg hurts. I’m bored. Maybe I should stop. My willpower is failing.” We experience this as a personal failure of a solid “I.”

The Insightful Investigation: This is the crucible where the deepest insights arise. The initial wholesome intention is now under attack from a host of new, competing intentions that arise from unpleasant feelings.

The Intention Born of Pain:
Vipariṇāmi:
An unpleasant feeling arises in the knee. This gives rise to the intention to move. This is a process. It starts as a whisper (“this hurts a bit”), transforms into a shout (“I have to move!”), and fuels fantasies of the relief that will come from standing up.

Aññathābhāvī: “The wholesome intention to remain still has ceased. Now, the powerful, unwholesome intention to escape this pain has arisen.”

Anicca: The meditator’s job is to see this powerful urge to move as anicca. It feels like an absolute command, but it is just another impermanent, conditioned mental event. By watching it without reacting, you see it change, pulse, and sometimes even fade on its own. It is an unreliable tyrant.

The Intention Born of Boredom/Restlessness:
Vipariṇāmi: A neutral or unpleasant feeling of restlessness arises. This gives rise to the process of seeking distraction. The intention to plan the rest of the day, to re-live a conversation, or to worry about a problem actively hijacks the mind.

Aññathābhāvī: “The intention to watch the breath has been overwhelmed, and the intention to engage in planning has arisen.”

Anicca: The powerful pull of thinking feels more interesting than the “boring” breath. But this intention to think is also anicca. It is an unreliable escape route. Seeing its transient nature allows you to gently let it go and renew the original intention.

The Practice of Renewal:
During this phase, the key practice is Aññathābhāvī. You notice: “Ah, the intention to sit has been replaced by the intention to get up.” By simply noting this change, you are no longer identifying with the new intention. You see it as an impersonal invader. Then, you can consciously generate a new wholesome intention: the volition to return to the breath, just for this one moment. The “one-hour sit” is revealed to be a series of hundreds of tiny moments of losing the intention and gently, kindly renewing it.

The Final Ten Minutes
The Conventional View:
“Almost there! I’ve nearly done it. I’m strong.” Pride begins to build.

The Insightful Investigation:
Vipariṇāmi:
The original intention changes its flavor. It is no longer one of struggle, but may transform into a process of endurance, or even one of renewed peace as the mind finally settles down.

Aññathābhāvī: “The state of agitated struggle has ceased. Now, a state of patient acceptance, born of the renewed intention, has arisen.”

Anicca: Even this late-stage peace is uncertain. Pride itself can become a distraction. The timer going off will end it. It is just another temporary, conditioned state.

The Final Liberating Insight
When the hour is over, the deep insight is not “I did it.” It is:
“The initial wholesome intention to meditate for one hour was an impermanent, unreliable mental formation (anicca). Throughout the hour, it was in a constant process of decay and transformation (vipariṇāmi), constantly being replaced by other competing intentions born of pain and restlessness (aññathābhāvī). The practice was not about having an unbreakable will, but about seeing the impersonal arising and ceasing of all these intentions, and gently renewing the wholesome one again and again.”
You see that there was no single “meditator” in charge. There was only a chaotic, beautiful, and selfless dance of competing, impermanent intentions. This frees you from pride in success and guilt in failure. It transforms the act of meditation from a grim battle of will into a wise and compassionate process of observing nature.

Analyzing hindrances in meditation
This is the perfect and most practical continuation of what hindrances could come in meditation. Having established the wholesome intention to meditate, we are immediately confronted by the mind’s habitual patterns of resistance: the Five Hindrances (pañca nīvaraṇāni).

The Buddha taught that these are the primary obstacles that obscure the mind, drain its energy, and prevent the arising of wisdom. The conventional approach is to fight them, suppress them, and feel frustrated by them. The path of insight, however, uses the hindrance itself as the object of meditation. By turning the bright light of mindfulness onto the hindrance, we see its true nature and it dissolves on its own.
Let’s investigate each hindrance as it arises during a meditation session, seeing it through the lens of anicca, vipariṇāmi, and aññathābhāvī.

Kāmacchanda (Sensual Desire)
The Deeper Sense: This is not just sexual desire. It is the mind’s craving for any pleasant experience through the five senses. In meditation, it manifests as the mind escaping the present moment (the “boring” breath) to wander into pleasant fantasies: re-living a delicious meal, planning a vacation, thinking about a movie, or fantasizing about a person. It is the mind seeking a hit of pleasant feeling (sukha-vedanā).

The Investigation:
Notice Vipariṇāmi (The Process):
Observe sensual desire as an active process of fantasy-building. It starts with a flicker—a memory of a taste or a sight. This triggers a pleasant feeling. This feeling fuels the intention (cetanā) to elaborate, to build a story, to create a detailed inner movie. You are watching the mind actively spin a web of desire.

Notice Aññathābhāvī (The Result): “A state of relative calm on the breath has ceased. Now, born of a memory, a state of agitated, pleasant daydreaming has arisen.” The mind has been hijacked; its state has completely changed from being present to being lost in a fantasy world.

Reflect on Anicca (The Liberating Insight): This fantasy world feels so alluring and real. But the craving for it, and the fantasy itself, are completely unreliable. They are conditioned by a fleeting memory. If you watch the fantasy without feeding it, you will see its anicca nature. The excitement fades, the details blur, and it dissolves. It is a temporary, ghost-like pleasure. Seeing this, you are no longer its prisoner. You can gently return to the reality of the breath.

Thīna-Middha (Sloth and Torpor / Dullness and Drowsiness)
The Deeper Sense:
This is the heavy, sinking, foggy state of mind. Thīna is the mental dullness, the lack of energy. Middha is the physical drowsiness, the leaden feeling in the limbs. It is a state of contraction and withdrawal, where the mind lacks the energy to stay with the meditation object.

The Investigation:
Notice Vipariṇāmi: Observe sloth and torpor as a process of shutting down. It’s not an on/off switch. You can feel the clarity of mind slowly being replaced by fogginess. The intention to be alert weakens. The head begins to nod. You are watching the process of consciousness losing its brightness and energy.

Notice Aññathābhāvī: “A state of clear, alert attention has ceased. Now, a heavy, sinking, and dull state of mind has arisen.”

Reflect on Anicca: This heavy state feels overwhelming and permanent, as if you’ll be sleepy forever. But it is a conditioned state, often arising from subtle aversion to the practice. It is anicca. If you apply energy—by adjusting your posture, opening your eyes, or doing a short walking meditation—the state can change dramatically. By seeing its impermanent and conditional nature, you don’t have to surrender to it. You know it is just a temporary weather pattern in the mind.

Vyāpāda (Ill Will / Aversion)
The Deeper Sense:
This is the mind’s reaction to unpleasant feeling (dukkha-vedanā). It can range from subtle annoyance (at a sound, at a physical pain) to intense anger or hatred. In meditation, it often arises as irritation at the pain in your knee, anger at a distracting noise, or replaying an old argument in your head, nursing a grievance.

The Investigation:
Notice Vipariṇāmi:
Watch ill will as a process of nurturing negativity. It begins with an unpleasant feeling. The mind then starts a process of inner commentary: blaming, judging, rehearsing angry words. Feel the physical process: the jaw tightening, the chest constricting, the body heating up. It is an active process of generating and sustaining negativity.

Notice Aññathābhāvī: “A state of neutral awareness has ceased. Now, born of a painful feeling in the knee, a state of hot, tight, hostile rejection has arisen.” The open mind has become a clenched fist.

Reflect on Anicca: The anger feels so justified and solid. But it is just a conditioned, impermanent mental fire. It depends entirely on the unpleasant feeling or memory for its fuel. If you can bravely watch this hot energy without acting on it, you will see it change. It is anicca. It will burn itself out. By not identifying with it, you are no longer the “angry person”; you are the calm space in which the temporary storm of anger is seen to pass.

Uddhacca-Kukkucca (Restlessness and Worry)
The Deeper Sense:
This is the “monkey mind.” Uddhacca is the agitated, restless, scattered state of mind that cannot settle. It jumps from thought to thought. Kukkucca is a specific kind of restlessness: worry, remorse, or regret about past actions (“I shouldn’t have said that”) or future events (“What if I fail?”).

The Investigation:
Notice Vipariṇāmi:
Watch restlessness as a process of chaotic mental motion. The mind literally cannot stay still. It’s a high-energy process of jumping from one thought-object to the next without landing. For worry, observe the process of the mind spinning “what if” scenarios, a frenetic and exhausting activity.

Notice Aññathābhāvī: “A state of one-pointed focus has ceased. Now, a state of scattered, fragmented, and agitated thinking has arisen.” The mind has gone from a calm lake to a boiling pot.

Reflect on Anicca: This agitated state feels like the mind’s true nature, impossible to tame. But it is just a state of high energy, conditioned by underlying anxieties. It is anicca. Like any storm, it doesn’t last forever. By patiently and kindly returning to the breath again and again, without judging the restlessness, you stop feeding it energy. The very act of observing it with detached kindness allows its impermanent nature to reveal itself, and it will eventually settle.

Vicikicchā (Skeptical Doubt)
The Deeper Sense: This is the state of indecisive, questioning paralysis. It’s not the intelligent inquiry of a curious mind, but a cynical doubt that undermines the practice itself. “Is this the right technique? Am I doing this correctly? Does this stuff even work? Am I capable of this?” It is a state of inner debate that leads nowhere.

The Investigation:
Notice Vipariṇāmi:
Observe doubt as a process of internal argument. Watch the mind weigh pros and cons, go back and forth between two opposing thoughts, creating a state of mental friction and indecision. The mind is spinning its wheels, going nowhere.

Notice Aññathābhāvī: “A state of trusting engagement with the practice has ceased. Now, a state of cynical, paralyzing indecision has arisen.” The mind has become its own worst enemy.

Reflect on Anicca: Doubt feels like a deeply intelligent and valid critique of the path. But it is just another conditioned mental state. It is anicca. It often arises when the practice becomes difficult, as a subtle form of aversion. By seeing it not as a valid philosophical position but as a temporary, impermanent mental hindrance, you can let it be. You don’t have to answer the questions. You can gently acknowledge, “Ah, the state of doubt has arisen,” and then, with renewed intention, return to the simple, non-debatable reality of this in-breath and this out-breath.

Should meditation be done in closed eyes or open eyes or both? Is there any mention of closed eyes in sutta?

Buddha does not mention either closed eyes or open eyes meditation nor there is any specific mention of that in the sutta.
On the contrary, the ultimate goal of the Buddha’s path is not to become a specialist in “closed-eyed meditation.” The ultimate goal is total, unbroken liberation of the mind in all postures and all situations. The practice is —being in constant awareness, watching anicca, dukkha, anatta (or anicca, vipariṇāmi, aññathābhāvī) all the time—is the pinnacle of the path.
Let’s break down this sophisticated understanding.

The User’s Correct Assertion: The Goal is Constant Awareness
The Buddha’s core instructions, particularly in texts like the Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta (The Foundations of Mindfulness), emphasize a continuous and comprehensive awareness that extends to all of life’s activities. He outlines mindfulness of:
The body, including the four postures (walking, standing, sitting, lying down).
Feelings (vedanā), arising and passing away.
Mind-states (citta), whether they are greedy, angry, deluded, or liberated.

The fundamental principles of reality (dhammas), including the Five Hindrances, the Five Aggregates, the Six Sense Spheres, and the Four Noble Truths.

Nowhere in this foundational discourse does he make “closing the eyes” a mandatory or central instruction. The emphasis is on clear comprehension (sampajañña) in everything you do: “When going forward and returning, he has clarity; when looking ahead and looking away… when bending and stretching… when eating, drinking, chewing, and savoring… he has clarity.”
This is the open-eyed, 24/7 practice. It is the end goal.

The Nuance: Why “Eyes Closed,” Then? The Principle of Skillful Means
So why has “eyes-closed” meditation become the nearly universal method for formal practice? The answer lies in the principle of skillful means (upāya) and the relationship between the two “wings” of meditation: Samatha (Calm/Concentration) and Vipassanā (Insight).

Samatha (Sharpening the Tool): Samatha practice is aimed at calming the mind, unifying consciousness, and developing powerful concentration (samādhi). The mind, in its ordinary state, is scattered and agitated like a boiling pot of water—it’s impossible to see anything clearly in it. Samatha is the practice of turning down the heat so the water becomes still and clear.

Vipassanā (Using the Tool): Vipassanā is the practice of using that now-stilled, clear, and powerful mind to see the true nature of reality—to see anicca, dukkha, and anatta directly.

The Role of the Eyes: The sense of sight is, by an overwhelming margin, the most dominant and demanding of our senses. It constantly bombards the mind with data, triggering feelings, perceptions, and intentions. To try and develop deep calm and concentration (samatha) while this firehose of information is active is extremely difficult.
Therefore, closing the eyes is a skillful tactic of temporary sense restraint (indriya saṃvara). It is a way of creating a simplified, controlled “laboratory” environment. By temporarily shutting down the biggest source of distraction, we give the mind a fighting chance to settle down, gather its energy, and become a sharp, powerful tool.

The Relationship: Formal Practice as the Training Ground
Think of a musician.
Closed-Eyed Meditation (Formal Practice):
This is like the musician in their studio, alone, practicing scales, chords, and difficult passages over and over. This is not the final performance, but it is the indispensable training that builds the skill, strength, and precision required to perform beautifully.

Open-Eyed Awareness (Life as Practice): This is the musician on stage, playing a live concert with a full band. They are not thinking about the individual scales now. The skills they honed in the studio are now integrated, allowing them to respond to the music, the audience, and their bandmates with fluid, creative, and masterful ease.
Without the focused training in the “studio” (formal sitting), the mind lacks the stability and sharpness to see clearly during the chaotic “concert” of daily life. Without applying the skills in the “concert” of daily life, the studio practice remains a sterile, isolated experience that doesn’t lead to true liberation.

Conclusion: A Synthesis of Both
The complete path looks like this:
Formal Sitting (Often with eyes closed): We use this time as a training ground. We deliberately reduce external stimuli to more easily observe the arising and ceasing of the hindrances and to develop the calm power of samādhi. We use this controlled environment to get intimately familiar with the feeling of anicca, vipariṇāmi, and aññathābhāvī in our own mind and body.

Daily Life (Always with eyes open): We take the stability, clarity, and insight cultivated on the cushion and apply it to every moment. When we are walking, standing, and talking, we are now better equipped to see the impermanent, changing, and selfless nature of our experience. We see the arising of aversion when someone cuts us off in traffic, not as “my anger,” but as the impersonal process we studied on the cushion. We see the arising of desire for a beautiful object not as “I want,” but as the familiar, unreliable flicker of kāmacchanda.

Sampajañña as the Active Investigator
While “clear comprehension” is the standard, convenient translation of sampajañña, it is profoundly misleading. It suggests a static, after-the-fact knowing, like “I clearly comprehend that I have just walked.”
My definition—”an investigative way to see what is coming and going in all six senses”—is far more accurate, active, and aligned with the function of Vipassanā (insight). Sampajañña is not just knowing that you are doing something; it is the faculty of discerning intelligence that investigates the how and the what of the experience in real-time, through the lens of Dhamma.

Let’s deconstruct this deeply by looking at why “Clear Comprehension” Falls Short
“Clear comprehension” misses the active, discerning quality. I can “clearly comprehend” that I am angry, but this doesn’t stop the anger. It’s just labeling. True sampajañña is the intelligence that investigates the anger itself.

Sampajañña as the Active Investigator
The Satipaṭṭhāna Sutta and its commentaries elaborate on sampajañña by breaking it down into four distinct investigative functions. This fourfold analysis perfectly supports my definition. Let’s look at them in the context of an action, like reaching for a cup of tea.

The Four Aspects of the Investigation (Sampajañña):
Investigating the Purpose (Sātthaka-sampajañña):
This is the first investigation: “Is this action purposeful? Is it beneficial? Is it wholesome?” Before the hand even moves, this discerning faculty investigates the intention. Is the intention born from genuine thirst, or from a desire to distract myself from an unpleasant thought? This is an active investigation into the why behind the action.

Investigating the Suitability (Sappāya-sampajañña):
This is the investigation of wisdom in context. “Is this a suitable way and time to perform this action?” If I am in formal meditation, is it suitable to break my posture for a cup of tea right now? Or is it more suitable to watch the desire for tea as an impermanent feeling? This is an active investigation into the how and when.

Investigating the Domain of Meditation (Gocara-sampajañña):
This is the investigation that keeps the mind from straying. As I reach for the cup, the mind’s tendency is to wander off into plans, memories, or fantasies. Gocara-sampajañña is the active intelligence that continuously brings the attention back to the “domain” (gocara) of the practice—the direct, moment-to-moment sensations of the moving arm, the feeling of the warm cup. It is constantly investigating, “Is my mind where it’s supposed to be?”

Investigating as Non-Delusion (Asammoha-sampajañña):
This is the very heart of my definition. This is the ultimate investigation, seeing the experience with non-delusion. As the arm reaches, this faculty investigates the reality of the action, seeing it not as “I am reaching” but as an impersonal process. It investigates the “coming and going” at every level:
“There is the coming of the intention to move.”
“There is the coming of the air element (motion) as the muscles contract.”
“There is the coming of a series of tactile sensations (body-contact).”
“The intention is now going, having fulfilled its function.”
“The pleasant feeling from the warmth of the cup is coming, and it too will go.”
“The perception ‘cup’ is coming and going.”
The entire event is seen as a cascade of impermanent, conditioned phenomena (anicca, vipariṇāmi, aññathābhāvī) arising and passing away. There is no solid “I” to be found anywhere in the process.

A Real-Life Example: Priya in the Traffic Jam
Let’s revisit our practitioner, Priya, stuck in the Pune traffic.
The “Clear Comprehension” Model: Priya would simply note, “I am clearly comprehending that I am sitting in a car and feeling stressed.” This is a passive label with little power to liberate.

The Investigative Sampajañña Model (my Definition):
Priya actively investigates the “coming and going” within her six senses:
Ear: “There is the coming of a loud, jarring sound from a horn. An unpleasant feeling has come. The perception ‘annoying driver’ has come. Now, the sound is going. The feeling is going.”
Body: “There is the coming of a hot, sticky sensation. There is the coming of tension in my shoulders. This tension is a process (vipariṇāmi); it is not static.”
Mind: “The intention to get angry (vyāpāda) is coming. Ah, there it is. It feels hot. It is an impermanent, conditioned reaction. It is not ‘me.’ Now I can watch it go without acting on it.”
Non-Delusion (Asammoha): She sees the whole experience not as “I am stressed in traffic,” but as: “This is just an impersonal stream of sights, sounds, feelings, perceptions, and intentions, all arising and ceasing, all coming and going. There is no solid entity here being afflicted.”

Conclusion:
We need to move beyond the simplistic translation of “clear comprehension.” Sampajañña is the active, investigative intelligence of mindfulness. It is the mind’s ability to act as its own scientist, constantly applying the frameworks of the Dhamma—the hindrances, the aggregates, the elements, and most fundamentally, the three characteristics of anicca, dukkha, and anatta—to the raw data of the six senses. It is the very faculty that watches the “coming and going” and, in doing so, dismantles the illusion of self.

Published by Spiritual Essence

This website is for providing appropriate and proper knowledge relating to achieving Nirvana or Nibbana either by following Buddha Dhamma. The most easiest and efficient path is Buddha Dhamma which covers. 1. aspect of purification 2. Overcome sorrow and lamentation 3. Coming out of physical and mental discomfort 4. Approaching in the proper way through Eight fold path 5. Experiencing Nibbana all the time

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Anumodana Sankalpa

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading